Relative Valuation
Relative Valuation, also known as Comparables Analysis or Multiples Valuation, is a valuation method that estimates a company’s worth by comparing it to similar businesses (or transactions) using market-driven metrics. Instead of projecting detailed cash flows, analysts rely on established valuation multiples—such as Price-to-Earnings (P/E) or EV/EBITDA—to gauge how the market is pricing comparable companies.
Key Multiples and Ratios
-
Price-to-Earnings (P/E)
- Formula:
- Interpretation: Measures how much investors are willing to pay for each dollar of the company’s earnings. More relevant when net income is a reliable measure, and capital structure differences aren’t too large across peers.
-
Price-to-Book (P/B)
- Formula:
- Interpretation: Often used for financial institutions, where book value (shareholders’ equity) is a key driver. A P/B ratio above 1 suggests the market values the company’s net assets above their balance sheet carrying value.
-
EV/EBITDA
- Formula:
- Interpretation: Commonly used for capital-intensive companies because EBITDA approximates operating cash flow. EV/EBITDA is considered less sensitive to capital structure and tax differences.
-
EV/Sales
- Formula:
- Interpretation: Useful for early-stage or high-growth companies not yet profitable. It benchmarks the value of each dollar of revenue across companies with similar business models.
-
EV/EBIT
- Formula:
- Interpretation: Similar to EV/EBITDA but factors in depreciation and amortization, making it more comparable across companies with similar accounting practices and CapEx profiles.
Steps in Relative Valuation
-
Identify Comparable Companies or Transactions
- Look for peers in the same industry or those with similar business models, growth rates, and margins.
- For precedent transactions, focus on deals in the same sector or similar transaction sizes.
-
Select Relevant Multiples
- Choose metrics (P/E, EV/EBITDA, etc.) based on the company’s financial profile, capital structure, and industry norms.
-
Calculate Multiples for the Comparables
- Gather each peer’s market data: share prices, outstanding shares, enterprise values, earnings, revenue, etc.
-
Determine a Valuation Range
- Look at the comparable group’s multiples (e.g., mean, median, high, low).
- Apply a suitable multiple (or range of multiples) to your target company’s corresponding metric (e.g., your company’s EBITDA).
-
Adjust for Differences
- Consider outliers or differences in growth prospects, operational scale, capital structure, or profitability margins. You may adjust your target’s valuation up or down accordingly.
Strengths and Weaknesses
Strengths
- Market-Driven: Reflects how the market is currently valuing similar businesses.
- Quick and Intuitive: Less intensive than building a full DCF model.
- Widely Recognized: Investors, bankers, and analysts regularly use these multiples.
Weaknesses
- Assumption of Similarity: Requires genuinely comparable peers; differences in growth, margins, or business models can undermine the analysis.
- Market Fluctuations: Subject to overall market sentiment—multiples can become inflated or depressed based on broader market cycles.
- Limited Forward-Looking Insight: While it can indicate how others are valued, it doesn’t provide intrinsic insight into a firm’s long-term potential as a DCF might.
Simple Example
Assume you want to value a software company, XYZ Corp, and you have three listed comparable software firms:
Company | Market Cap (M) | Net Debt (M) | EBITDA (M) | EV (M) | EV/EBITDA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 1,000 | 100 | 100 | 1,100 | 11.0x |
B | 1,500 | 300 | 150 | 1,800 | 12.0x |
C | 800 | 0 | 80 | 800 | 10.0x |
Median | - | - | - | - | 11.0x |
XYZ Corp has:
- EBITDA: $90M
- Net Debt: $50M
Step 1: Determine a Median Multiple
From the table, the median EV/EBITDA multiple is 11.0x.
Step 2: Apply the Multiple to XYZ Corp
Step 3: Calculate Equity Value
If XYZ’s net debt is $50M, then:
Relative Valuation is an essential tool for quickly comparing companies and assessing how the market values similar businesses. While it doesn’t replace a thorough intrinsic analysis like a DCF, it offers a timely snapshot of market-based expectations, making it a vital part of a well-rounded valuation approach.